Hello everyone,

We are further optimizing our residential and commercial products based on market feedback to better serve our customers.

As a valued partner, your experience and insights are key to helping us upgrade our products, improve efficiency and make installation more convenient.

This short survey will only take a few minutes—your feedback will directly influence the design of our upcoming products.

As appreciation for your input, we will credit 200 AIKO Installer Community (AIC) points to your account after you complete the survey.

Register now if you are not a member yet

Thank you for being part of the AIKO Installer Community.

Your Email

Please enter the email address you used when registering for the AIKO Installer Community so we can process your request more quickly!

I am

Country

1．For 1762-size double-glass BLACK modules, what is your acceptance level for double-glass monofacial modules (+3W output with the same €/W price level)? Can they replace double-glass bifacial modules?

A. Prefer bifacial modules
B. Both can coexist depending on scenario
C. Prefer monofacial modules
D. Not sure

2．For 1762-size double-glass WHITE modules, what is your acceptance level for double-glass monofacial modules (+3W output with the same €/W price level)? Can they replace double-glass bifacial modules?

A. Prefer bifacial modules
B. Both can coexist depending on scenario
C. Prefer monofacial modules
D. Not sure

3. For 1762-size module static load selection, the current maximum front and back static load is 5400/2400 Pa。If there are products with higher static load, which option do you prefer?

A. Meets most scenarios, no upgrade needed (to maintain current price level)
B. Need upgrade to 6000/4000 Pa, accept small price increase
C. Prefer having multiple load options for different project needs
D. Not sure

4. Standard 1762-size double-glass modules have 2.0mm+2.0mm front/rear glass, weight ~24kg. If the glass could be reduced to 1.6 mm + 1.6 mm, what would you choose?

A. Prefer 1.6mm+1.6mm (21kg) for easier installation
B. Keep 2.0mm + 2.0mm (concerned about reliability)
C. Both options for different scenarios
D. Not sure

product are two

5. For the 1762-size modules, if the open-circuit voltage of the upgraded product (50V+) is higher than that of the current version (40V); and for the 2382-size modules, if the open-circuit voltage of the upgraded product (60V+) is higher than that of the current version (50V). Do these factors influence your choice of these two modules?

A. It doesn’t matter, both are acceptable.
B. Upgrading Module 1762 is OK, but do not upgrade Module 2382.
C. Upgrading Module 2382 is OK, but do not upgrade Module 1762.
D. It’s best not to upgrade either of them.

6. If a 1762-size hail-protection product is launched with glass thickness 2.5mm+1.6mm and weight 24.8kg, does this product appeal to you?

A. Not attractive
B. Attractive – good to have an extra option if the price is same
C. Attractive – would accept a small price increase
D. Not sure

7. For 60-cell modules, do you prefer the current power(540-550W) 1954 size，or the power of 500W（smaller 1857 size） ? (Same price per watt.)

A.Prefer current module with higher power (540-550W)
B.Prefer the upgraded module with the power (500-510W) for it is better suited to a variety of installation scenarios
C.Both are OK for me
D. Not sure

8. Do you have any other suggestions or requirements for module installation, module selection and functional requirements?

Agree to the privacy policy

I have read and agree to the privacy policy.*

Read the privacy policy !